Theft of Government Property lawyer Alexandria, VA

Federal theft of government property charges—prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 641—are serious federal offenses handled in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. When the U.S. Attorney’s Office brings an indictment alleging theft, embezzlement, or conversion of federal funds, equipment, or records, the stakes are high: federal sentencing guidelines apply and there is no parole in the federal system. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., practicing since 1997, concentrates a portion of its federal criminal defense practice on representing individuals facing these allegations in Alexandria’s federal court. Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of the firm, and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys appear before the Alexandria federal bench. If you or someone you know is under investigation or has been indicted for theft of government property in Alexandria, Virginia, request a consultation by calling (888) 437-7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

On This Page

What Federal Theft of Government Property Means in Alexandria

A charge under 18 U.S.C. § 641 covers a wide range of alleged conduct—from embezzling funds from a federally funded program to stealing equipment from a military installation to converting government records for personal use. In Alexandria, these cases are investigated by federal agencies such as the FBI, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, or the IRS Criminal Investigation division. The Alexandria Division of the Eastern District of Virginia is one of the busiest federal dockets in the country, known for relatively swift case processing. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Alexandria frequently pursues charges involving government property theft alongside related counts such as conspiracy, mail fraud, or wire fraud, compounding the potential exposure.

Because the alleged property belongs to the United States, federal jurisdiction is automatic, and the case will proceed in the U.S. Courthouse at 401 Courthouse Square in Alexandria. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly converted government property to an unauthorized use. Defenses may turn on whether the defendant intended to deprive the government of the property, whether the property was actually federal, or whether the government’s investigation complied with constitutional requirements. An experienced federal criminal defense lawyer familiar with the Alexandria court’s pretrial and trial practices is essential at every stage—from the initial appearance before a magistrate judge through any potential sentencing hearing.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle These Cases

Federal theft of government property proceedings begin with an investigation, which may include grand jury subpoenas, search warrants, and witness interviews. The firm steps in as early as possible—ideally before an indictment is returned—to evaluate the government’s evidence, engage with the investigating agents, and, where appropriate, present information to the U.S. Attorney’s Office that could lead to a declination or a more favorable charging decision. If an indictment has already been handed down, the immediate focus shifts to the detention hearing, discovery, and motion practice tailored to the Alexandria Division’s local rules and the assigned judge’s standing orders.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work to identify factual weaknesses in the government’s case—discrepancies in property records, gaps in the chain of custody, Miranda and Fourth Amendment issues—and to develop a defense strategy that may include challenging the evidence, negotiating a resolution that reduces potential penalties, or preparing the case for trial. Throughout the process, the firm assists clients in understanding the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines calculation relevant to the charged conduct, evaluates whether any mandatory minimums apply, and examines opportunities for downward departure or variance.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. His background includes first-chair trial experience and an in-depth understanding of how the government builds a federal criminal case. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring additional litigation experience, and together the team concentrates on federal criminal defense matters that demand procedural rigor and thorough preparation.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring extensive combined legal experience. Results may vary. The firm’s Arlington location serves clients in Alexandria, Old Town, Del Ray, Kingstowne, and surrounding communities. All consultations are by appointment; reach the firm at (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the penalty for theft of government property under federal law?

The potential penalty for theft of government property under 18 U.S.C. § 641 depends on the value of the property and the defendant’s criminal history, with exposure ranging from a misdemeanor-level offense to a felony carrying substantial prison time. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines base offense level rises with the loss amount, and enhancements may apply for abuse of a position of trust, sophisticated means, or obstruction. Because there is no parole in the federal system, any term of imprisonment is served substantially in full. A knowledgeable federal defense attorney can explain the sentencing range specific to your case and explore every lawful avenue to mitigate the consequences.

How does the process work for a federal theft of government property case in Alexandria?

After an investigation, the government presents evidence to a federal grand jury; if an indictment is returned, the case begins with an initial appearance and arraignment in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. A magistrate judge handles pretrial matters including detention or bond conditions. Discovery, motions, and plea negotiations follow. If no resolution is reached, the case proceeds to trial before a district judge and, in most instances, a jury. Sentencing occurs after a conviction or guilty plea and is governed by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines with judicial discretion post-Booker.

Do I need a federal criminal defense lawyer if I am accused of stealing government property in Alexandria?

Yes—retaining a lawyer who concentrates on federal criminal defense in the Alexandria Division is critical because federal procedures, evidentiary rules, and sentencing guidelines differ significantly from state court. The U.S. Attorney’s Office is experienced and well-resourced, and an unrepresented defendant may inadvertently waive important rights during the investigation or pretrial phase. Early legal guidance can influence charging decisions, pretrial release conditions, and the overall trajectory of the case. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys are available to discuss your situation.

What are common defenses to a federal theft of government property charge?

Defenses may include lack of criminal intent, insufficient evidence that the property belonged to the United States, mistake of fact, entrapment, or constitutional violations in the government’s investigation. In some cases, the defense demonstrates that the accused had authorization to use or possess the property. Each defense must be evaluated against the specific facts and the government’s evidence. An experienced federal defense attorney can identify the most viable strategy after a thorough review of discovery materials and applicable Fourth and Fifth Amendment issues.

Can I be charged with both state and federal theft for the same conduct?

Yes, dual prosecution is possible when the alleged conduct violates both state and federal law, though it is uncommon for theft of government property unless the same act also constitutes a state-level offense like embezzlement or larceny. The Double Jeopardy Clause generally does not bar parallel state and federal prosecutions because they are brought by separate sovereigns. If you are facing charges in both systems, it is important to have counsel who can coordinate the defense across jurisdictions and protect your interests in each proceeding.

How do the federal sentencing guidelines apply to a theft of government property conviction?

The federal sentencing guidelines start with a base offense level for theft offenses under § 2B1.1, then adjust based on the amount of loss, the number of victims, and specific offense characteristics such as the use of sophisticated means or an abuse of a position of trust. A defendant’s criminal history category also affects the advisory range. The court may consider downward departures for substantial assistance to the government or, in limited circumstances, a variance below the guidelines. Understanding the guidelines calculation early in the case allows a defense attorney to advocate effectively at every stage, from plea negotiation to sentencing.

Authoritative resources: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · United States Code (Title 18)

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary. Engaging Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. Requires a signed engagement agreement. © 1997-2026 Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.