Embezzlement lawyer Alexandria, VA

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Embezzlement lawyer Alexandria, VA





Embezzlement lawyer Alexandria, VA

Last reviewed: July 2026 Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.

Federal embezzlement allegations can disrupt your life, your career, and your reputation. If you are facing an investigation or have been charged in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, securing experienced legal representation early is critical. Embezzlement prosecutions frequently involve detailed financial records, agency audits, and active pursuit by the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys understand how federal prosecutors build these cases and work to develop thorough defense strategies from the very beginning. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., founded in 1997, represents clients in federal criminal matters throughout Virginia, including Alexandria. The firm’s attorneys are admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and draw on extensive combined legal experience in federal court. Results may vary. For a confidential consultation, call (888) 437-7747.

What Federal Embezzlement Means in Alexandria, VA

Federal embezzlement generally involves the wrongful taking of money or property entrusted to someone by the government or by an organization that receives federal funds. In Alexandria, these charges are prosecuted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, often by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Two primary statutes cover most federal embezzlement cases:

Under 18 U.S.C. § 641, embezzlement of government property valued at more than $1,000 is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine.

Source: 18 U.S.C. § 641. 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Cornell)

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, admitted in VA, MD, DC, NJ, NY.

18 U.S.C. § 666 covers theft concerning programs receiving federal benefits in a single year, also carrying a maximum prison term of 10 years.

Source: 18 U.S.C. § 666. 18 U.S.C. § 666 (Cornell)

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, admitted in VA, MD, DC, NJ, NY.

Because the crime involves misuse of a position of trust, sentencing can be severe under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which guide the judge’s discretion after any mandatory minimums are applied. The federal system has no parole, and good-time credit is limited. A conviction may also require full restitution and can affect professional licenses and security clearances. The Alexandria courthouse, located at 401 Courthouse Square, handles a wide range of federal criminal matters, and the judges in the Eastern District are known for their efficient docket management. Investigations are typically conducted by agencies such as the FBI, IRS‑CI, or inspectors general, and an indictment follows a grand jury proceeding. Engaging counsel before the indictment is often crucial, as early negotiation may influence the scope of the charges or the conditions of pretrial release.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Embezzlement Cases

Defense of a federal embezzlement charge begins with a careful review of the government’s evidence, particularly financial records, accounting methods, and witness statements. Mr. Sris, a former prosecutor, understands how federal agents build white‑collar cases and knows where weaknesses may lie. The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys contribute additional experience in federal litigation and work collaboratively to examine every detail.

The legal team evaluates whether the government can prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt—intent to deprive, existence of a trust relationship, and the precise value of the alleged loss. They may engage forensic accountants to analyze the government’s numbers. If procedural errors occurred during the investigation, such as an improper seizure of records, motions to suppress or for a bill of particulars may be filed. The firm also explores whether restitution offers or cooperation agreements could lead to a more favorable resolution. Should the case proceed to trial, the firm is prepared to present a thorough defense, cross‑examine government witnesses, and challenge the credibility of the prosecution’s narrative. Throughout the process, the firm remains focused on protecting the client’s rights and working toward the trusted achievable outcome. Results may vary. No attorney can guarantee a particular result.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., has practiced law since 1997 and is a former prosecutor. His prior experience inside the prosecution’s office provides valuable insight into how federal white‑collar cases are investigated and tried. He is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova).

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring additional federal defense experience and litigation skill. Together, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys handle federal criminal matters in Alexandria and throughout the Eastern District of Virginia. The firm’s approach is collaborative, ensuring each client benefits from the collective legal insight of the entire team. The firm has represented individuals in a wide range of federal criminal cases and is prepared to address the specific challenges posed by embezzlement charges.

To discuss your situation with Mr. Sris or an Of Counsel attorney, call (888) 437-7747.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is federal embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. § 641?

Federal embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. § 641 is the illegal taking of money or property that belongs to the United States government or is within its control. The statute covers theft by a person who is entrusted with the property, whether as an employee, contractor, or agent. The property need not be cash; it can be any tangible item or even intangible benefits. A violation can be charged as a felony if the value exceeds $1,000; otherwise it may be a misdemeanor. The prosecution must prove the defendant intended to convert the property to their own use without authorization. Conviction can carry a prison sentence of up to 10 years and a substantial fine, along with restitution obligations.

What should I do if I am facing embezzlement charges in Alexandria, VA?

If you are facing federal embezzlement charges in Alexandria, contact an experienced federal criminal defense attorney immediately and do not discuss the case with anyone else. Preserve all relevant documents, but do not destroy or alter any evidence. Federal investigators have likely already gathered significant materials, and any additional communication could be used against you. Refrain from speaking with colleagues or supervisors about the matter. The firm can be reached at (888) 437-7747 to schedule a confidential consultation. Early involvement of counsel can affect how the case is charged and may create opportunities for pre‑indictment resolution.

Can embezzlement charges be reduced or dismissed in federal court?

Embezzlement charges may be reduced or dismissed if the government’s evidence is insufficient, key records are excluded, or there is a viable affirmative defense. Challenging the alleged loss amount, proving lack of intent, or demonstrating that the defendant lacked access to the funds are common strategies. Procedural defenses, such as violations of the Speedy Trial Act or improper grand jury procedure, can also lead to dismissal. While dismissal is never past results do not guarantee a similar outcome, a skilled defense may result in a reduced charge or a more favorable sentencing position. Results may vary. Depending on the facts of each case.

Do I need a lawyer for federal embezzlement charges?

Yes, retaining a qualified federal criminal defense lawyer is critical when facing embezzlement charges because the consequences are severe and the government has substantial resources. Federal prosecutors are highly experienced, and the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines often produce lengthy prison terms. An attorney can challenge the prosecution’s case, negotiate a plea agreement, and present mitigating evidence at sentencing. Attempting to navigate the federal court system without counsel places you at a considerable disadvantage. The firm offers confidential consultations; call (888) 437-7747.

How do the federal sentencing guidelines affect an embezzlement case?

The federal sentencing guidelines assign a base offense level and then adjust it upward based on the amount of loss, the number of victims, and the defendant’s role. Embezzlement cases typically fall under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, which ties the sentence directly to the loss amount. Even relatively modest loss figures can trigger guideline ranges that include imprisonment. Other factors—abuse of trust, sophisticated means, obstruction of justice—can add points. While the guidelines are advisory, judges in the Eastern District of Virginia consistently consider them. An experienced defense attorney can identify departures and argue for a sentence below the guideline range, including under the “safety valve” or “substantial assistance” provisions.

What is the difference between federal and state embezzlement charges in Virginia?

Federal embezzlement charges involve theft from the federal government or programs receiving federal funds, while state embezzlement covers theft from private entities or the Commonwealth of Virginia. Federal cases are prosecuted in U.S. District Court by the U.S. Attorney and carry federal sentencing guidelines with no parole. State embezzlement, such as under Va. Code § 18.2-111, is typically handled in Virginia General District Court or Circuit Court and has its own penalty structure. Someone could face both sets of charges if the conduct overlaps. The procedural rules and available defenses differ significantly between the two systems. An attorney admitted in federal court can guide you through those differences.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results may vary.

Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.


All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.