Securities Fraud lawyer Manassas, VA
Federal securities fraud charges—including insider trading, market manipulation, and material misrepresentation—are prosecuted actively in the Eastern District of Virginia. If you have received a target letter, a grand jury subpoena, or a visit from federal agents in the Manassas area, the decisions you make in the hours and days that follow matter. Mr. Sris, a former prosecutor and the Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., represents individuals and corporate officers facing securities-fraud investigations. He and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring decades of courtroom experience to pre-indictment negotiations, trial, and sentencing. For a confidential consultation, call (888) 437-7747. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. – Advocacy Without Borders.
Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder
Admitted in Virginia, Maryland, District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York
Practicing since 1997
Last reviewed: July 2026
On This Page
ToggleWhat Securities Fraud Means in Manassas
The city of Manassas and the surrounding Prince William County fall within the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). Securities fraud cases investigated by the FBI, the SEC, or the U.S. Attorney’s Office are filed in the EDVA’s Alexandria, Richmond, or Norfolk divisions. Because the EDVA is known for its swift docket, the timeframe from indictment to trial can move faster than in many other federal districts.
Securities fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1348 and related statutes covers a range of conduct—insider trading schemes, false statements in SEC filings, misuse of material non-public information, and fraudulent broker-dealer practices. The federal sentencing guidelines treat financial crime seriously. A person convicted of a federal securities-fraud offense faces the possibility of a lengthy term of imprisonment and significant financial penalties. There is no parole in the federal system.
Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys understand how the U.S. Attorney’s Office builds securities-fraud cases. They examine every stage of the government’s investigation—the grand jury process, the chain of document production, the interviews of cooperating witnesses—to identify factual weaknesses and procedural irregularities.
How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Securities Fraud Cases
A federal securities-fraud matter typically begins with an investigation by a regulatory or law-enforcement agency—often the SEC, the FBI, or the IRS Criminal Investigation division. If a client retains the firm early, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys can engage with the investigating agent or the prosecutor before charges are filed. Early intervention sometimes leads the government to narrow the scope of an investigation or decide not to pursue an indictment.
If charges are brought, the Speedy Trial Act requires an initial appearance and arraignment to occur promptly. Pretrial motions may challenge the sufficiency of the indictment, the admissibility of evidence, or the scope of discovery. The firm prepares each case as though it will proceed to trial, evaluating every bank record, trading statement, email communication, and sworn statement the government intends to introduce. This preparation often creates leverage during plea negotiations, and when a negotiated resolution is not in the client’s interest, the firm has the trial experience to present a complete defense before a jury.
At sentencing, the court considers the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, the nature and scope of the alleged loss, and any acceptance-of-responsibility adjustments. The firm advocates for a sentence that accurately reflects the client’s individual circumstances and the facts of the case.
About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys
Mr. Sris founded Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. in 1997 after serving as a prosecutor. His career began in the courtroom, evaluating evidence and presenting cases to judges and juries—experience he now applies on behalf of people facing federal charges. Mr. Sris testified before the Virginia House Courts of Justice Committee in support of 2019 HB 635 (chief patron Del. David Bulova). He is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, and he leads the firm’s federal criminal defense practice.
The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys include litigators with backgrounds in criminal defense, complex motion practice, and appellate advocacy. While each federal securities-fraud case is staffed strategically, the client benefits from the collective judgment of attorneys who have handled investigations by the same agencies and proceedings in the same federal courthouse.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is securities fraud under federal law?
Securities fraud is the knowing use of deception or misrepresentation in connection with the purchase or sale of a security, including insider trading. The principal federal statutes are 18 U.S.C. § 1348 and the fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act. The government must prove that the defendant acted willfully and with intent to defraud. Defenses often turn on whether the alleged misstatement was material, whether the defendant possessed the requisite mental state, and whether the trading activity is consistent with a lawful investment strategy. Because the definition of a “security” can be broad, some cases involve financial instruments or investment contracts that an unrepresented person might not immediately recognize as falling within the statute’s reach.
What should I do if contacted by the FBI about securities fraud?
If an FBI agent contacts you, politely decline to answer questions and state that you wish to speak with an attorney. Do not attempt to explain your side of the story, even if you believe you have done nothing wrong. Statements you make to a federal agent—whether in person, by phone, or in writing—can be used against you in a later criminal proceeding. Contact an experienced federal criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. Early legal representation allows you to assess the true scope of the investigation and to determine whether voluntary cooperation is in your interest. Remember: you have the right to remain silent, and exercising that right cannot be held against you at trial.
Do I need a lawyer if I only received a target letter?
A target letter is a formal notification that you are a subject of a federal criminal investigation, and retaining counsel at this stage is critical. The letter often asks you to contact the prosecutor or testify before a grand jury. The decisions you make about whether to testify, what documents to produce, and how to respond to the government’s theories of liability can shape the entire course of the case. An experienced federal defense attorney can communicate with the prosecutor on your behalf, assess the strengths and weaknesses of the government’s position, and guide you through the grand jury process. In some instances, early intervention leads the government to close the matter without charges.
How does sentencing work in federal securities fraud cases?
Sentencing in federal securities fraud cases follows an advisory guideline range calculated under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, with the ultimate sentence imposed by the district judge. The guideline range is driven primarily by the amount of financial loss attributed to the offense and any adjustments for the defendant’s role in the scheme, acceptance of responsibility, or obstruction of justice. The judge may depart upward or downward from the guideline range based on factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Because there is no parole in the federal system, a sentence of imprisonment is served day-for-day, subject only to limited good-time credit. A thorough sentencing presentation, including objections to the loss calculation and detailed personal-history mitigation, is a core part of the firm’s representation.
Can securities fraud charges be dismissed before trial?
Yes, securities fraud charges can be dismissed if a pretrial motion demonstrates a legal defect in the indictment or a constitutional violation. Common grounds for dismissal include the government’s failure to allege a material misrepresentation, the expiration of the statute of limitations, or a violation of the defendant’s right to a speedy trial. In some cases, the government voluntarily dismisses charges after discovering that a cooperating witness is not credible or that key documentary evidence was obtained unlawfully. While dismissal is never past results do not guarantee a similar outcome, a meticulous review of the prosecution’s evidence and the grand jury record is the firm’s starting point on every case.
Additional nearby pages that may interest you:
Federal Criminal Defense in Fairfax County ·
Federal Criminal Lawyer in Prince William County ·
Federal Criminal Lawyer in Manassas Park ·
Federal Criminal Lawyer in Fairfax City
Primary sources: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · 18 U.S.C. § 1348 · Virginia Judicial System
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Results may vary.
Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case.